What does Iowa’s performance in the draft say about their last two seasons?

3 min read
What does Iowa’s performance in the draft say about their last two seasons?

What does Iowa’s performance in the draft say about their last two seasons?

The only other time Iowa had this many draftees in back-to-back seasons was 2009-11 but the team results haven’t matched

What does Iowa’s performance in the draft say about their last two seasons?

The only other time Iowa had this many draftees in back-to-back seasons was 2009-11 but the team results haven’t matched

The Iowa Hawkeyes just made history. With seven players selected in this year's NFL Draft, the program set a new single-year record. Over the last two drafts combined, that number jumps to 12—a feat only previously matched by the Hawkeyes' standout classes from 2010 through 2012. But here's the twist: while those earlier teams turned that pipeline of talent into a New Year's Six bowl trophy, the current squad hasn't reached that same level of team success.

So what gives? How can Iowa consistently churn out NFL-ready athletes yet fall short of elite results on the field? Are the Hawkeyes underachieving, or is there something deeper at play?

The answer might come down to position value. In today's NFL, the biggest paydays go to quarterbacks, edge rushers, wide receivers, offensive tackles, and cornerbacks. Look at Iowa's recent draftees: Mason Richman (7th round, 2025), Gennings Dunker (3rd round, 2026), Kaden Wetjen (4th round, 2026), TJ Hall (7th round, 2026), and Max Llewellyn (7th round, 2026) all fit those premium positions. But context matters. Wetjen, for instance, was drafted primarily for his return skills rather than his receiving ability—though he did flash leading up to the Senior Bowl.

Now compare that to the Big Ten teams that made the College Football Playoff in the last two seasons. Indiana produced 10 draft picks, including two first-rounders at quarterback and wide receiver, plus another QB, another WR, and a cornerback. Ohio State? A staggering 25 picks, with eight first-rounders spanning wide receivers, an offensive tackle, a linebacker, three edge rushers, three cornerbacks, another tackle, and a quarterback. Oregon had 17 picks, with four first-rounders including an offensive tackle, a defensive end, a quarterback, two more tackles, two wide receivers, and a cornerback. Penn State chipped in 13 picks, with three first-round edge rushers, a quarterback, an offensive tackle, and another defensive end.

Yes, Ohio State's 25 picks is almost laughable—they're in a league of their own. But the pattern is clear: the teams playing for national championships are stockpiling talent at the game's most impactful positions. Iowa, on the other hand, is producing quality Big Ten starters like Richman and Dunker, but they lacked the elite athleticism to climb higher in the draft. Wetjen isn't a true receiver, and Hall and Llewellyn simply aren't enough to tip the scales.

For Hawkeye fans, the takeaway is bittersweet: the talent is there, but it's not landing where it matters most. And until that changes, the program's ceiling might remain just out of reach.

Like this article?

Order custom jerseys for your team with free design

Related News

Back to All News